Obama wins Nobel prize because of “Potential.” Fetus, not so lucky.
Join Obama, not in his “peace” prize but rather his inability to avoid prenatal violence

According to Lisa Schiffrin at NRO:
Some people have noted that Barack Obama has not actually achieved peace, anywhere, or diminution of hostilities, or the destruction of even one nuclear weapon, (or even any of his domestic agenda). But, as the Nobel Committee announced, this award is about a new climate of hope.
Ironically, the fact that the unborn has not achieved certain powers and abilities it may only actualize in the future, and does not actualize in the present, is employed by some bioethicists to justify abortion. So, Obama’s potential gets him the Nobel Peace Prize, while the unborn’s potential, unfortunately, is not enough to avoid being awarded the prize of prenatal violence.
Like this:
~ by chicagobluesgirl on October 13, 2009.
Posted in Opportunity to barf
Tags: Abortion, FirstThoughts, Nobel Prize, NRO, Obama, PeacePrize, Unborn


I do believe that the only thing the chosen one did accomplish besides fooling American’s that he would “rule” from the middle, was to pass legislation in Illinois supporting late term partial birth abortions. This to me is the murder of an innocent child and it confuses me how any Christian could posssibly support this man. He has no respect for any life, whether it be the “partially born” or the elderly, needing health care. Giving him the Nobel Peace Prize just diminishes its credibility further as a liberal popularity contest. Worthless.
That and reversing Bush’s ban on funding abortions abroad so we as tax payers can pay for foreign abortions and then the health care bill which includes tax payers paying for abortions at home. In a nutshell, he funds hitmen for babies.