Obamacare not dead yet…
From Heritage.org
January 27, 2010 | By Amanda J. Reinecker
Although it’s on life-support, Obamacare is not dead, The Heritage Foundation’s Brian Darling warns. There are some who still plan to “forge forward and pass [it] by any means necessary.”
In the wake of Republican Scott Brown’s astounding victory in deep-blue Massachusetts last week, Obamacare proponents have been hard-pressed for ways to pass their unpopular health care reform bill.
And as President Obama prepares his State of the Union address for tonight (the speech starts at 9:00 p.m. Eastern time—check back to our Facebook page for updates), Heritage Foundation President Ed Feulner provides his own assessment of the current state of our union, including health care. He describes the Left’s “signature health care reform initiative [as] a colossal missed opportunity.”
Shortly after Brown’s victory, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) admitted that she doesn’t have enough votes to pass the Senate bill by a simple majority. Yet the Left’s solution, Politico reports, is “giving a sweeping reform bill one more try,” even as some Democrats favor a scaled-back proposal.
Meanwhile, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) has proposed legislation that would eliminate the filibuster, which requires 60 Senators to agree to end debate before a vote can occur. Members of both parties have used this procedural hurdle to slow or block Senate action, including most notably the health care legislation.
But these “solutions” don’t address the core concerns the American people have with Obamacare.
“The President and Congress are facing a fork in the road,” writes Darling. Conservatives should take advantage of this temporary lull to represent the voice of real, bipartisan reform.
Heritage health care expert Nina Owcharenko lays out what these principled reforms would include:
* Treat All Insurance the Same. The same tax breaks given to employer-provided health coverage should be applied to insurance plans purchased by individuals. Ideally, Congress would implement a system of universal tax credits.
* Reform Existing Health Care Programs. Spending on current health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid is growing out of control. They are bankrupting our nation at an accelerating pace, and expanding them, as the Left’s health care bills would do, would only exacerbate the financial burden on taxpayers. Without significant reform, the aging of the U.S. population and rapidly rising health care costs will dramatically increase federal entitlement spending in coming years.
* Use Federalism, Not One-Size-Fits-All. States are the best place to test ideas. And because health care needs vary greatly across the country, reform should not entail a one-size fits all package. “Congress should embrace a federal-state partnership that would preserve diversity in the states,” suggests Owcharenko. “The states’ role would be to devise the best ways to achieve common national goals–for example, to establish a mechanism for portability.”
These reforms would help to address the many problems with our existing health care system without expanding the size and scope of the federal government. Plus, they would likely achieve bipartisan support because they honor the President’s promises not to increase the deficit or raise taxes on the middle class. Both the current House and Senate bills break these promises.
Conservatives should seize this opportunity to truly reform America’s health care system — and it really does need reform — in a manner that respects individual liberty and boosts, not breaks, our economy.


Hey Chi-Town…long time no talk…hope things are good. I just posted a quick blog about tax increases in Oregon – these states are so shortsighted in their plans to fix their horrible fiscal problems. Check it out, and hope all is well.
BTW, I think we disagree on the recent decision regarding corporations and political ads. Corps have too much influence as it is.
http://www.spdbrnr.wordpress.com
OK, I’ll check it out. I’m going to greatly enjoy corporations and banks finally getting back at the libs. The unions have had the option to spend however much they want to support THEIR candidates, it’s time to give business the same opportunity. Hope you are well. We have some friends who live in Oregon…politically…a very frightening state in which to live.
Ok…I definitely see where you’re coming from on getting some firepower against the unions, which have helped largely in destroying this country. But the big, multinational corps don’t have America’s best interest at heart, either. They know the growth and opportunities are abroad, not at home, so the legislation they push for will also not be of great benefit to the masses.
Bottom line, the masses still don’t have a real voice in DC – just look at what these awful politicians do regardless of their constituency’s thoughts.